Technique and Applications of tissue microarray in pathology study: A review Applications of tissue microarray in pathology : A review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tissue microarray (TMA) technology is a high-throughput method that enables the simultaneous analysis of multiple tissue samples within a single paraffin block. By extracting small core biopsies from donor blocks and arranging them systematically into a recipient block, TMAs allow uniform experimental conditions, efficient biomarker evaluation, and preservation of valuable tissue resources. This review discusses the historical development of TMA technology, construction techniques, major applications in predictive, prognostic, validation, and progression studies, and its role in oncology and oral pathology research. The advantages, limitations—particularly tumor heterogeneity—and recent technological advancements in automation and digital pathology are critically evaluated. Special emphasis is placed on the application of TMAs in oral cavity diseases and bioimaging. TMA remains a powerful and evolving tool in molecular pathology and translational research.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Medical and Oral Biosciences uses a Creative Commons Attribution (CC Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0) and its license of (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows the authors to hold ownership of the copyright of their articles.
Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). ![]()
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 the authors are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
References
1. Bubendorf L, Kononen J, Koivisto P, Schraml P, Moch H, Gasser TC, et al. Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high‑throughput fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res. 1999;59(4):803‑6. doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.20.1758 .
2. Dey P. Tissue microarray in pathology: principle, technique and applications. In: Basic and Advanced Laboratory Techniques in Histopathology and Cytology. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 241‑6. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6616-3_22.
3. Mousses S, Wagner U, Chen Y, Kim JW, Bubendorf L, Bittner M, et al. Failure of hormone therapy in prostate cancer involves systematic restoration of androgen responsive genes and activation of rapamycin sensitive signaling. Oncogene. 2001;20(46):6718‑23. doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204889.
4. Jawhar T. Tissue microarray: a rapidly evolving diagnostic and research tool. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(2):123‑7. doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.51806.
5. Parker RL, Huntsman DG, Lesack DW, Cupples JB, Grant DR, Cheang M, et al. Assessment of interlaboratory variation in immunohistochemical determination of estrogen receptor status using breast cancer tissue microarrays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117(5):723‑8. doi.org/10.1309/PEF8-GL6F-YWMC-AG56
6. Vogel UF. Overview on techniques to construct tissue arrays with special emphasis on tissue microarrays. Microarrays (Basel). 2014;3(2):103‑36.doi.org/10.3390/microarrays3020103.
7. Werry JE, Müller S, Wehrhan F, Geppert C, Frohwitter G, Ries J, et al. Accuracy analysis of a next‑generation tissue microarray on various soft tissue samples of Wistar rats. Appl Sci. 2021;11(12):5589. doi.org/10.3390/app11125589
8. Fowler CB, Man YG, Zhang S, O'Leary TJ, Mason JT, Cunningham RE. Tissue microarrays: construction and uses. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;724:23‑35. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-055-3_2.
9. Zanini C, Forni M. The cell block technique revisited for cells cultured in adherence and as spheres. Histochem Cell Biol. 2013;140(6):685‑90. doi.org/10.1007/s00418-013-1139-0.
10. https://www.biochain.com/blog/the-tissue-microarray-tissue-analysis-from-research-to-treatment/
11. Palo S. A simplified method of manually constructing small‑format tissue microarray for use in resource‑constrained settings. Iran J Pathol. 2023;18(1):210‑6. doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2023.562055.2972
12. Gollapudi S, Singh K, Small C, Mukherjee S, Ohgami RS. Creation of efficient pathology research pipelines for discovery: tissue microarray construction coupled with digital image analysis. J Clin Transl Pathol. 2021;1(1):28‑33. doi.org/10.14218/JCTP.2021.00012.
13. García‑García R, Rodríguez‑Vidales EP, Soto‑Domínguez A. Quick and inexpensive method to elaborate tissue punches useful in paraffin tissue microarrays. Int J Morphol. 2013;31(1):50‑4. doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022013000100007.
14. Ştefan AE, Gologan D, Leavitt MO, Muşat S, Pleşea IE, Stan LGR, et al. Tissue microarrays—brief history, techniques and clinical future. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020;61(4):1077‑83. doi.org/10.47162/rjme.61.4.10
15. Glinsmann‑Gibson B, Wisner L, Stanton M, Larsen B, Rimsza L, Maguire A. Recommendations for tissue microarray construction and quality assurance. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2020;28(4):325‑30. doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000000739.
16. Ahn S, Woo JW, Lee K, Park SY. HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):34‑44. doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03
17. Ramsower C, Wisner L, Zellner K, Glinsmann‑Gibson B, Larsen B, McGrath M, et al. Assessment of 2‑year storage conditions on protein, RNA, and DNA in unstained human tissue sections. Biopreserv Biobank. 2022;20(6):473‑84. doi.org/10.1089/bio.2021.0023
18. Chen YJ, Yang CM, Huang JS, Wang P, Lv YH, Tang C, et al. An introduction of an easy‑operating and economical technique for tissue microarray preparation. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(7):403‑7. doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206142.
19. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Bärlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med. 1998 Jul;4(7):844-7. doi: 10.1038/nm0798-844. PMID: 9662379.
20. Vogel UF. Construction of high‑density tissue microarrays with up to 2500 paraffin tissue core biopsies 0.3 mm in diameter. Pathologe. 2009;30(3):192‑8. doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2012.46.6.562
21. Sharangpani GM, Joshi AS, Porter K, Deshpande AS, Keyhani S, Naik GA, et al. Semi‑automated imaging system to quantitate estrogen and progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in human breast cancer. J Microsc. 2007;226(Pt 3):244‑55. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01772.
22. Zhang JY. Mini‑array of multiple tumor‑associated antigens to enhance autoantibody detection for immunodiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Autoimmun Rev. 2007;6(3):143‑8. doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2006.09.009.
23. Lu C, Lewis JS Jr, Dupont WD, Plummer WD, Janowczyk A, Madabhushi A. An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric‑based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease‑specific survival. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(12):1655‑65. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.98
24. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‑424.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
25. Abdel Hamid HM, Darwish ZE, Elsheikh SM, Mourad GM, Donia HM, Afifi MM. Cytotoxic nanoconjugates in oral cancer therapy. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:78. doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07849
26. Rahman TY, Mahanta LB, Chakraborty C, Das AK, Sarma JD. Textural pattern classification for oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Microsc. 2017;269(1):85‑93. doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12611
27. Duraiyan J, Govindarajan R, Kaliyappan K, Palanisamy M. Applications of immunohistochemistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(Suppl 2):S307‑9. doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100281
28. Kleinstein SE, Nelson KE, Freire M. Inflammatory networks linking oral microbiome with systemic health and disease. J Dent Res. 2020;99(10):1131‑9. doi.org/10.1177/0022034520926126
29. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805‑20. doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022
30. Richani K, Romero R, Kim YM, Cushenberry E, Soto E, Han YM, et al. Tissue microarray: an effective high‑throughput method to study the placenta for clinical and research purposes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(8):509‑14. doi.org/10.1080/14767050600852718